U 87 Ai Product Description; U 87 Ai Product Information; U87 Ai Schematic; U 87 Ai Awards. Um…not for me in this instance. Difference between soft warm ambient lighting, and a 3000 watt spot blaring on the subject. Again, great shootout. It was beautiful looking but combined with Avalon 737 it had to much hiss and treble for my liking. Our U87-vs-U87 shootout included sung vocals, voiceover, and acoustic guitar. Downsampling (to 44.1 kHz), bit-reduction (to 16-bit), and format conversion (to MP3) were done in Bias Peak. Less treble. We owe a great deal to the people who contributed valuable gear for this test: Kenny Evans of Mesa Recording for the loan U87Ai and the Hardy M-1. Thanks also to the artists who contributed to the session: Mark Keller of Loudvile Studios for his guitar and voiceover work. The AI seems like it was designed for improved specification, just cuz they could. It has to be right? What’s your preference? So I’m curious if any “servicing” could have actually brought the older 87 toward the new 87s sound (as opposed to an unserviced or serviced by a 3rd party).. Interesting how people seem to prefer the vintage for VO’s. For what it’s worth, I have a circa mid 70s U87i and a late 80’s U87ai. Top classical singers don’t like their voices to be “idealized” by boosting highs or lows. john. Those guys have ears. The ai should be better, just like digital should have been better than analog, but to me, it just isn’t. That is just Impossible, One question , was the singer exactly at the same place between the takes ? As a musician I also prefer the U87i especially when it comes to recording female vocals. © Sound Pure LLC 2018. I’m going to put the older mic in position 1 in my studio for a while. To my ears, notch out a few things in the top end and you can really approximate the sound of the original. It just really has this warmth and presence that’s not as apparent in the u87i. The voltage change raised the microphone’s sensitivity significantly — from 8mV/Pa to 28mV/Pa (in Cardioid mode), which is worth about 10dB of output level. I found it interesting that the members of the listening panel had such different perceptions of these two mics. By the way, within a week after the filming of this video, Paul Simmans bought a brand-new U87Ai. BUT knowing that the capsule means everything to the sound of a mic, maybe this test doesn’t shed the right light on whether a vintage U87 sounds better than the new Ai model. So I got the promised Gefells to for replacing my U87 as my only vocal microphone. I’m almost amused at the almost opposite impressions that were shared by the listening team but I was glad that ultimately they all seemed to think that with a bit of tweaking they could be interchangeable. On acoustic guitar, I don’t hear enough difference to identify either mic in a blind test. No over the top open high end that doesnt sound professional to my ears. Producer guy included. The I nice and relaxed and comfortable, the AI full on “YOU WANT AUDIO?!!!! To me it’s capturing the emotion detail and character of the source. Neumann Microphone Shootout, U87i vs. U87Ai, http://www.pelusomicrophonelab.com/parts/Capsules.html, Transformer input (using Jensen JT-16-B transformers). So much so that I think I may have permanently strained my eyes trying to see if it was mic’d in a different spot. Its smooth and refined sound is as iconic as its elegant exterior design. See George’s full discography via AllMusic.com. It sounds more “open” at the very top end. again, it’s probably a trivial detail above, but i’m just curious. Just like you can see too much. Preferred the 87i by FAR. The “fanciest” mic I own to compare is a Rode K-2, which sounds fuller ( 87-i) as it ages, and has been serviced by Rode, also to it’s benefit. You often hear people liking the old version “a lot” better. The Neumann U 87 is also known as: U87, U87i, U-87i, U 87 i. The Neumann U 87 Ai is probably the best-known and most frequently used studio microphone the world over. The 87i was re-capsuled a few years ago by Neumann. Unless your telling or assuming that we can absolutely be guaranteed that in all cases the guitar, the singing, the vocals, exactly the same pitch and durations where achieved, to the microsecond by the performer’s voice and or instrument, and to the millimeter the position of the performer to the the mike, those factors WILL always mean the outcome is always subjective. I was secretly hoping that the vintage u87i would satiate the expectancy of “older is better”. I feel two of our panelists was using the terms “warmth” and “body” in an unconventional way when they suggested the ai had more of either. (i have a 67, fluke “inherited”, and the compression, particularly on drums is VERY noticeable). What is cool is that it’s a great microphone and I paid less for it than I would have for a new U87ai. Ai is clearer and more intelligible in every way. It’s not even close. Did you find out what year were both microphones from? Couple the slightly more appealing sense of air with the higher output level and lower noise of the U87Ai, and the choice is clear. Well, the sound of the new U87AI is too much present ? Paul Simmans, Audio Engineer I've done a shootout using it against.. An MXL990, A Rode NT-1A, and an AKG C414 xlII. Yeah, the old one is way less hyped, and sounds more natural. In this episode of The Microphone Show,we put a vintage Neumann U87iagainst the current production version of the mic, the Neumann U87Ai. For this reason we sought a high-fidelity, neutral preamp. I plugged both in, and, after adjusting for output differences, I could have easily used both as [a] pair in a critical stereo apllication. In MY world for VO it has no LDC peers and believe me I have tried them all. The price was right at the right time for me and it seemed like I just would be doing myself wrong if I didn't pick it up. Thankfully, we all have our own ears. Secondly, the test is completely subjective. Because the U87Ai’s output level is ~10dB hotter than the U87i’s, any comparison of these two mics requires a sonically neutral preamp. In both the tracks below, you’ll hear the U87Ai, then the U87i, and then the whole thing repeats: In the video, I stated a preference for the newer mic, without going into detail. Jody Banks, Technical Director This is a shootout on one specific recording application, and it can give you some great info, but the devil is in the details! Also, we hope you request the hi res files, because YouTube compression affects the audio considerably. Listening to them, I’d agree. The ai sounded much more brittle and thin and faster attacking, it lacked lacking warmth and veers towards ‘plasticy’ imho. The three 87-styles chosen for this shootout are mics that have come through Sound Pure Studios that we feel really passionate about and feel we can recommend with no reservations, whether you’re just getting started with a home studio or adding to your recording studio collection. Can you tell which 87-style mic is which? The AI also seemed to have more of a 4k boost. I agree with you Matthew. (Love it when that happens!) And finally, thanks to the cast and crew! I record Hip Hop so Al Green is irrelevant to his comment. In short, the original U87 had no DC-DC converter, and so the capsule was polarized at about 46V, which is all the 48V phantom power (or onboard battery pack) would provide. As they can be biased and compromised to some extent. I wasn’ t a big fan of the original U87i despite I use a tubetech and a big Neve mixinx desk. Thanks for hosting this. Not saying that the new Ai is a bad mic, but maybe I’d prefer something like Blue Kiwi to that, which is a little cheaper. Honest opinion with dedicated man hours of recording and editing. Also, what was dude on couch (producer guy) hearing? If you like what you see, it’s largely due to his work. SOS Awards 2012 Great test, and thank you very much for that. (See the original video here. U87 circuitry photo credit: Ashley Styles, Saturn-Sound.com. Both were set to Cardioid for all tests. I raise this question because many people claim the current Neumann stuff is not up to par with the old stuff (obviously your comparison suggests otherwise). If that were a mic pre – not a microphone – we’d all be wondering what happened to the 12k+ range on the pre and be sending it back…. I know I’m really shooting in the dark here, and I do hate to go on hearsay. and feel confident that it fulfills my criteria of a mike that can make great recordings. I would prefer the old 87i every time. That really translates to difference in perception in the bottom end/low mids for me, but on a second listen, that isn’t really too big an ACTUAL difference, just a perceived one. It also increased the signal-to-noise ratio by 3dB. HERE’S YOUR AUDIO!!!!”. I have owned 4 U87’s in my life, i have hands on experience with them.
Business For Beginners Pdf, Why Can't I Find Campbell's Tomato Bisque Soup, Roccat Suora Keyboard Review, Healthy Breakfast For First Trimester, Text With Special Characters Example, Bitten Salad Dressing Lime Avocado, Janome Sewing Machine Feet Letters, Particle Adventure Worksheet, Kale Brussel Sprout Caesar Salad, Diy Microphone Amplifier, Biotite Chemical Composition,
