Next, you're implying that my posts are an insult to the many great engineers who use Neumann mics and value them highly. It's about mics with forward treble not working. Pleeeeease... "Harshness" is not only frequency curve and cannot be fully "undone" by applying another frequency curve. Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress, Prev: 5 Plugin Discount Websites YOU SHOULD KNOW // Black Friday Special. audio techncia 40 series is lightyears better. This seems to me to be an entirely rational position and I find it curious as to why it's creating such a controversy on these pages. a totally different legaue. However, Rode K2 is available at a much lower price point. I just worked on a record with a singer where it was hard to choose a mic cause anything I put in front of her sounded amazing. But when something is distorted, it's distorted. There may be a great feature of u87 that I don't know about which justifies its high price. It depends on material. If I understand you correctly in your post above, you're pointing out to the popularity of Neumann mics among professionals as proof of them being worth their high monetary value. It might be a supporting idea to help you build up a case, but that can't be a real argument. Your email address will not be published. I expect you to think this is poor taste, but I'll have to proceed with this style of inquiry. If what you'd like to argue for is the brand name and bragging rights, then fine. Was it helpful and informative of the world of sound recording? All setting were the same and the performance was captured simultaneously. Distorted sibilants. but I wonder if I could still hold that preference if a simple high-frequency-cut preset was dropped on the NT1-A file. You could get a $125 ribbon like Cascade Fathead and have nothing left of those Polish sibilant sounds. In the following article, we will discuss the comparisons between Rode K2 vs Neumann U87. when i buy a mic i never listen to singing samples. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered. In this... Reverb and Vocals go together like Saturation and Drums. Leave a comment below! We have blinds spots, we get influenced by power, prestige and we have strong confirmation biases. Despite being more affordable, its features do look more attractive. ive owned 3 rode nt1a and 1 nt1000. Would it be insulting to the many women, for example, if I pointed out that buying Luis Vuitton handbags doesn't get them much more than a fancy brand name? you also seem to have no idea about neumanns historical importance or the science they created and still do. There may be a great feature of u87 that I don't know about which justifies its high price. You need to hear both mics in an finished song, mixed and mastered. Neumann U87, Røde NT1-A, and Fifine K670. I didn't make your point at all, my post just went over your head. Join me each week as we explore another area of the world of Audio Engineering. If something is bright or dull. Now, to answer your question directly - yes, it would be nothing shocking that all the great engineers preferring the Neumann have mistaken a brand name for superior quality. Did you like this article? The onus is on the Neumann fans to prove why it's such a special microphone deserving a special budget. Neumann U87, Røde NT1-A, and Fifine K670. Hey there! The referral point for most of his mics is the almost universally venerated sound of vintage Neumann mics, with their midrange richness with a sibilance-free top end. Affordable LDC Microphone With Multiple Voicings, Already have an account? You may find that the Rode NT1A (left) sounds as good as a Neumann U87 on your voice. They have a peak, which may be undesirable in many applications. Let’s find out! Harshness means also nonlinear distortion in higher frequencies and cannot be cured with linear eq. a u87 is certainly not my favourite mic but its solid always. This week’s video shows a side by side comparison between 3 popular consumer and boutique microphones. I, for one, think it's a lazy rule of thumb. Thanks, Bill. KevWind, the way I pursue truth and understanding is not by examining a poll of opinions. ►Get your FREE 7 Day Mixing Survival Guide DOWNLOAD @ http://homestudiomixacademy.com/ This video will equip you with... Now is the best time to start creating something new, and share your skills and experiences with the world. So, this isn't really about some intrinsic quality; they're just two different characters. Whether the high prices and reputation came first or were a result of existing reputation is rather irrelevant in light of blind tests which place the mic in questions in the company of $300-500 microphones produced by other manufacturers. Unless someone can open my eyes to that, I am left with its performance as I can audition in a test. you can make it duller or brighter with the eq. Record VO and compress it and distort to get "modern" sound and differences will stand up immediately. On some voices, I felt I couldn't get enough of those NT1-A highs and it fit the mix so perfectly. Both microphones were plugged with equal cables to the pres of a Focusrite Liquid Saffire 56. That's it. Do you need expensive microphones to make a quality recording? I've done quite a few multi-microphone shoot-outs for workshop sessions that I've run, and I think that my experiences might shed some light on your question. All that means is that for that singer on that day in that studio for that song they sound similar. There are mics that are warm and sweet and would be perfect for your application, and still around price of the Rode and even less. Are they all falling prey to slick marketing? I just want you to make that clear, and we won't have to debate. I hope you'd take a moment to think about whether you really believe the "You get what you pay for" is a rational adage. Just a friendly reminder that political discussion, (including "offhand" and 'sideways' commenting) is. It's not that they're distorted. Both of them are condenser microphones with multiple polar patterns. You can't appeal to popularity when you're discussing the value of a product. Let’s find out! Comparing two mics on one singer means next to nothing. Join me each week as we explore another area of the world of Audio Engineering. I take each argument on its own merit. I think the readers of this thread will be better served if we remained on topic, if we're going to continue. KevWind, I'll choose to not respond to personal attacks. Well, let's ask one of them about how exactly her $10.000 bag betters a cheaper high-quality bag you could get in the mall. There was no opinion poll mentioned referenced or implied in my post. Maybe for the singer in the video a NT1-A is just fine. I do not doubt for a moment that if a $300 Rode, AKG or Oktava mic was produced by Neumann as a new $50.000 flagship ldc, many highly respected producers would buy it and praise it for its incredible realism, presence, punch and whatever. This is merely a regurgitation of your fallacious "appeal to authority " strawman tactic. Top 5 Microphones for Podcasting in Your Home Studio. Is it possible that the Neumann microphones are just good quality microphones, just like many others from Rode, Oktava, AKG etc, and the only This is a pure blind test over the renowned Neumann U87 vs the Rode NT1-A. Nobody said "B has too much distortion to be the u87.". Leave a comment below! You need an account to post a reply. i know the rode well and it sucks moneky balls. This is a pure blind test over the renowned Neumann U87 vs the Rode NT1-A. if people really do not hear the difference between a rode and a u87 they might wann hang out elswhere with all due respect. Was it helpful and informative of the world of sound recording? or upgrade their monitoring - or gather more experience. Humans, for the most part, are not rational. Unless someone can open my eyes to that, I am left with its performance as I can audition in a test and the build quality, which I doubt is any better than that of the NT1-A, for example. But it may not, so it's important that you try before you buy. In the case of the NT1a, the modifications were made to match its new sound to that of a U87. And you don't appeal to authority by bringing up the fact that "highly successful engineers, artists, and producers" are using that. im sorry but only a moron would think a nt1a is good. I hate having to repeat it, my friend, but there was a thread here not long ago where nobody could hear the distortion you're talking about in a blind test (myself included) and people mistakenly believed a cheaper $300 mic (as bright as the Rode when stock) was the u87, presumably because its treble peak was reduced by a very simple eq dip.
Rice Paper Tortilla, Mary Seacole Childhood, Distressor Plugin Waves, Watercress Seeds Meaning In Urdu, Fender Cd60 Mahogany, American Board Of Psychiatry And Neurology Certified Doctors, Calcium Hydroxide And Carbon Dioxide Reaction Equation, Fresh Salmon Price Per Kg, A-maze-n Pellet Smoker Instructions, Deuteronomy 32:2 Meaning,
